The Will of the Voters

Since the passage of Referendum C, Great Education Colorado has been working to make sure the legislature respects the voters’ will in spending the Referendum C dollars.

From Great Education Colorado’s Legislative Agenda:

Principle Three:  Referendum C monies must be spent in a way that keeps faith with the voters — that is, primarily on restoring cuts in education (pre-K – 12 and higher education) and health care.

That’s why we’ll:

Fight for budget priorities that match those of the voters.  Under current law, most new dollars that the state receives beyond current estimates will go to road construction.  While Colorado’s transportation needs are tremendous, the voters made clear their priority for health care and education.

The Bob Ewegen, the Denver Post’s Deputy Editorial Page Editor, gets it.

So does Wade Buchanan.

Read our FAQ about Referendum C.

Read More »

Editorial Pages Support Efforts to Fund Education

Here is a sampling of newspaper editorials from around the state supporting Gov. Ritter’s attempts to fund education.  These were in support of the previous mill levy proposal.  We’ll see how this new proposal is received.

From the March 15 Denver Post

Critics of Gov. Bill Ritter’s plan to expand preschool and kindergarten programs by “freezing” school property taxes are insulting the intelligence of local voters – most of whom have already approved just such a freeze.

Anti-tax fanatic Douglas Bruce was quick to asssail Ritter’s plan to hold property tax rates steady as a “tax increase,” based on his familiar claim that failure to cut taxes every year is the same as increasing them.

Bruce’s logic reminds us of a game we played as a kid called “backwards land,” where the object was do everything “sdrawkcad.” The adult viewpoint on taxes was better represented by Rep. Al White, R-Winter Park, who argued simply, “If I pay $100 this year and $100 next year, I don’t see that as a tax increase.”

From the March 29 Greeley Tribune:

So we believe the measure promoted by Ritter makes sense. It helps stabilize cash flow to schools before they become swamped further by unfunded mandates. It would bring some relief to four northern Colorado school districts on the bottom of the current funding curve.

From the March 31 Craig Daily Press:

Currently, we are in a wait-and-see mode.

We are waiting to see if the Board of Education decides 2 percent in cuts need to be made and what that would entail.

Waiting to see if the state Legislature will reform a funding formula that took MCSD from one of the top-funded districts in the state in the early 1990s to the lowest funded in the state per pupil this year.

What do you think?

If you support the proposal, Take a moment to sign our letter to the Senate.

Read More »

Decreased Funding Causes School Closure

Progress in school reform is hindered again by resources and the difficulty in finding adequate leaders as the KIPP Charter School at Denver’s Cole Middle School will close this spring.

From the Post on March 13:

A fledgling charter school is closing in northeast Denver after KIPP charter officials told Denver Public Schools Superintendent Michael Bennet on Thursday that KIPP was pulling out of the Cole neighborhood.

[...]At the time, charter school officials promised to take care of the existing Cole kids. They also promised to open a premier program in the neighborhood in the fall of 2007. The program would have started with fifth-graders.

But because the leadership of KIPP – Knowledge Is Power Program – couldn’t find a strong principal for northeast Denver, officials decided to shut the school down at the end of spring.

You need good people to run good schools.  You can’t find good people if funding levels keep you from offering a salary that is even remotely competitive.

Read More »

Unfortunate Truth About the Referendum C Funds

Today, the Post acknowledges an unfortunate truth about Colorado’s post-Referendum C budget: most of the new money goes to transportation, at the expense of education.  (Fixing this is one of Great Education Colorado’s highest priorities in our legislative agenda.  Click HERE to read more.)

From the editorial page of today’s Post:

“The new budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1 is the third spending plan to reflect the extra revenue voters authorized by approving a five-year timeout from the revenue ceilings imposed by the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. And like its two predecessors, the 2007-08 budget applies Ref C revenues disproportionately to transportation needs while keeping other programs, including higher education, on a lean budget.

“The upcoming budget contains at least $237 million from the state’s $7.2 billion general fund earmarked for additional transportation funding, with 90 percent of that sum earmarked for highways and the remaining 10 percent to mass transit. That $237 million bonus is on top of the $620.1 million the Colorado Department of Transportation receives in earmarked highway funds, mostly from fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees channeled through the Highway Users Tax Fund. CDOT also administers an additional $415.3 million in federal highway funds.”

The Post rightly notes that higher education has gotten the short end of Referendum C.  As is often the case, the Post fails to note that public education, too, remains woefully underfunded in the state budget.

Read More »

Harsanyi Misses the Point

David Harsanyi takes a narrow focus on Gov. Ritter’s plan to stop the education funding freefall.

From today’s Post:

“Perhaps. But if 2000′s perpetual tax increase for education, Amendment 23, and Referendum C (with tons of extra cash!) aren’t enough, why not ask Coloradans if they think another tax hike is in order?

“Make sure to call it ‘evenue stream enhancement’ to soften the blow.

“You’ll be fine.”

Not once does he mention that voters in 174 out of 178 of these districts has already approved this stablization.

Read More »

“Bashing Education a Blood Sport”

In today’s Post, retired public school teacher M.L. Johnson takes on the conventional wisdom that public education needs a complete overhaul and makes a plea for wise reform based on research, rather than fad.

“If there is genuine interest in closing the various achievement gaps, public policy should be based on research.

“[...]Until rational decisions based on research are applied to the problems of public education, the real problems will remain unaddressed.”

Agree?  Disagree?

Join Great Education Colorado, Speaker Andrew Romanoff, and Senator Peter Groff on April 9 for a conversation about education reform.  Click HERE to learn more.

Read More »

Summary of Reform Efforts in the Legislature

The State Capitol is abuzz with education reform efforts as the The Denver Post reported on February 27:

“While there are disagreements over details, a core agenda is taking shape:

“House Bill 1048, already signed into law by Gov. Bill Ritter, sets up a system to better track schools’ progress. It will create a more sophisticated way to show achievement than the current snapshot of scores on statewide assessment tests.

“Senate Bill 53, by Sen. Ron Tupa, D-Boulder, sets a commission to create smooth transitions from preschool up to college.

“Senate Bill 140 helps create a teacher tracking system that educators could use to match the best teachers with the most disadvantaged kids. The legislation from Sen. Nancy Spence, R-Centennial, says poor and minority kids are more likely to have less-qualified teachers.”

Most of these efforts are coming out of the recent Tough Choices or Tough Times Report presented in December 2006 by The New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce.

Hat tip to Speaker Romanoff’s blog.

Read More »